Skip to main content

Table 5 Comparison of different data fusion methods on gene-disease associations

From: PheSeq, a Bayesian deep learning model to enhance and interpret the gene-disease association studies

Method

Data modality

Strategya

Interpretation

Countb

Hitc

Alzheimers’ disease

    Lee 22 [78]

GWAS + eQTL

Early

/

12

8

    DeepGAMI [81]

Gene expression + GRN +eQTL

Early

Enrichment analysis

102

2

    scGRNom [82]

GWAS + Hi-C

Intermediate

Enrichment analysis

146

43

    GDAMDB [32]

GWAS \(+\) literature

Late

/

149

72

    PheSeq

GWAS \(+\) literature \(+\) PPI

Late

Phenotype and literature

1024

151

Breast cancer

    Kim 20 [79]

CNA + gene expression + methylations + clinical info

Intermediate

/

36

5

    Ahn 14 [83]

Transcriptome + pathway

Early

/

50

2

    GLRP [84]

Gene expression + PPI

Early

Interpretable neural network + pathway analysis

167

5

    IMNA [85]

GWAS + eQTL

Early

Literature

391

24

    PheSeq

Transcriptome \(+\) literature \(+\) PPI

Late

Phenotype and literature

818

159

Lung cancer

    Zhang 20 [80]

Methylation + gene expression

Early

/

23

2

    Gogleva 22 [86]

CRISPR + knowledge graph + literature

Intermediate

Interpretable recommendation system

31

8

    CTpathway [87]

Gene expression + transcriptome + pathway + PPI

Intermediate

Pathway analysis

59

12

    ECMarker [88]

Gene expression + clinical phenotype

Early

Interpretable neural network

500

19

    PheSeq

Methylation \(+\) literature \(+\) PPI

Late

Phenotype and literature

566

342

  1. aData fusion strategy. Early for data-level, intermediate for joint-level, and late for decision-level
  2. bCount of significant genes
  3. cHits of significant genes in DISEASES