Skip to main content

Table 3 Absolute number of overlapping CpGs and P values for the enrichment of significant CpGs from previous EWASs (N > 1000) in our data

From: DNA methylation and body mass index from birth to adolescence: meta-analyses of epigenome-wide association studies

Previous study (N sites associated with BMI)

Significance level

Analysis A: association of cord blood DNA methylation with early childhood BMI (2–5 years)

Analysis B: association of cord blood DNA methylation with late childhood BMI (5–10 years)

Analysis C: cross-sectional analysis of whole blood DNA methylation with childhood BMI (2–10 years)

Analysis D: cross-sectional analysis of whole blood DNA methylation with adolescent BMI (12–18 years)

 

1 × 10−5

N = 7

N = 8

N = 51

N = 26

0.05

N = 22,687

N = 20,645

N = 37,074

N = 25,292

Ali et al. [56] (3 CpGs)

1 × 10−5

0

Penrichment = 1

0

Penrichment = 1

0

Penrichment = 1

0

Penrichment = 1

0.05

0

Penrichment = 1

0

Penrichment = 1

1/3

Penrichment = 0.24

0

Penrichment = 1

Aslibekyan et al. [6] (8 CpGs)

1 × 10−5

0

Penrichment = 1

0

Penrichment = 1

0

Penrichment = 1

0

Penrichment = 1

0.05

0

Penrichment = 1

0

Penrichment = 1

1/8

Penrichment = 0.51

2/8

Penrichment = 0.08

Campanella et al. [57] (26 CpGs)

1 × 10−5

0

Penrichment = 1

0

Penrichment = 1

0

Penrichment = 1

1/26

Penrichment = 0.002

0.05

3/26

Penrichment = 0.16

1/26

Penrichment = 0.72

6/26

Penrichment = 0.02

11/26

Penrichment = 1.006 × 10−7

Geurts et al. [58] (310 CpGs)

1 × 10−5

0

Penrichment = 1

0

Penrichment = 1

2/310

Penrichment = 0.0006

2/310

Penrichment = 0.0002

0.05

12/310

Penrichment = 0.90

13/310

Penrichment = 0.73

103/310

Penrichment = 3.92 × 10−34

125/310

Penrichment = 6.63 × 10−70

Mendelson et al. [9] (83 CpGs)

1 × 10−5

0

Penrichment = 1

0

Penrichment = 1

2/83

Penrichment = 4.67 × 10−5

3/83

Penrichment = 1.81 × 10−8

0.05

4/83

Penrichment = 0.64

8/83

Penrichment = 0.045

28/83

Penrichment = 1.36 × 10−10

45/83

Penrichment = 3.02 × 10−33

Sayols-Baixeras et al. [59] (96 CpGs)

1 × 10−5

0

Penrichment = 1

0

Penrichment = 1

0

Penrichment = 1

0

Penrichment = 1

0.05

8/96

Penrichment = 0.13

9/96

Penrichment = 0.04

24/96

Penrichment = 1.53 × 10−6

30/96

Penrichment = 1.85 × 10−14

Sun et al. [26] black participants (36 CpGs)

1 × 10−5

0

Penrichment = 1

0

Penrichment = 1

0

Penrichment = 1

1/36

Penrichment = 0.002

0.05

3/36

Penrichment = 0.30

6/36

Penrichment = 0.007

13/36

Penrichment = 4.98 × 10−6

22/36

Penrichment = 1.50 × 10−18

Sun et al. [26] white participants (349 CpGs)

1 × 10−5

0

Penrichment = 1

0

Penrichment = 1

0

Penrichment = 1

0

Penrichment = 1

0.05

12/349

Penrichment = 0.959

22/349

Penrichment = 0.12

86/349

Penrichment = 4.13 × 10−19

116/349

Penrichment = 1.75 × 10−54

Wahl et al. [5] (187 CpGs)

1 × 10−5

0

Penrichment = 1

0

Penrichment = 1

2/187

Penrichment = 0.0002

3/187

Penrichment = 2.10 × 10−7

0.05

8/187

Penrichment = 0.77

11/187

Penrichment = 0.29

61/187

Penrichment = 1.97 × 10−20

77/187

Penrichment = 1.68 × 10−44

Wang et al. [25] (54 CpGs)

1 × 10−5

0

Penrichment = 1

0

Penrichment = 1

0

Penrichment = 1

1/54

Penrichment = 0.003

0.05

2/54

Penrichment = 0.79

4/54

Penrichment = 0.26

23/54

Penrichment = 2.49 × 10−11

33/54

Penrichment = 3.98 × 10−27

N CpGs in ≥ 2 adult studies

0.05

9/52 (17.3%)

23/75 (30.7%)

98/347 (28.2%)

163/465 (35.1%)

  1. Two cutoffs were used to select the significant findings in our results: a P value < 1 × 10−5, to identify “suggestive” findings, and a less stringent, nominal P value < 0.05, to identify any trends. We used a hypergeometric test to calculate enrichment with the phyper function in the R Stats package in R. Results in bold are nominally significant. Of those findings from adult studies that had a nominal P value (< 0.05) in our models, 17–35% were reported by more than one adult study